Using Discovery Learning Strategy as A Teaching Method to Enhance Conceptual Mastery Among Polytechnic’ Engineering Science Students in Learning Linear Motion


  • Geetha Subramaniam Mathematics, Science and Computer Department Polytechnic Sultan Idris Shah, Sungai Air Tawar, Selangor, MALAYSIA
  • Rasidah Sapri Mathematics, Science and Computer Department Polytechnic Sultan Idris Shah, Sungai Air Tawar, Selangor, MALAYSIA

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Discovery learning- conceptual mastery- physic- cognitive


The fundamental goal of all education worldwide is for students to have a conceptual knowledge of concepts. Students' conceptual challenges with science topics have become the primary concern of science educators. Since physics is the primary science topic, a strategy to strengthen students' conceptual understanding is necessary. Thus, a teaching strategy for enhancing students' conceptual understanding is required. Discovery learning is one of the methods used to enhance conceptual knowledge. This study is an experimental study with a pretest-posttest design for one group. Its objective is to determine whether implementing discovery learning as a teaching strategy can enhance students' conceptual mastery. This study's subjects are 44 engineering science students from Polytechnic Sultan Idris Shah. The study's data collection approach is a test. The research design is a one-group pretest-posttest design, which means that only one group gets treatment. The pre-test and post-test scores and N-Gains scores measure how well the treatment worked. Data were collected from August through October 2022. The results reveal that students' post-test scores improved compared to the pre-test. In addition, data analysis has determined that using the discovery learning model might raise students' N-gain scores, with a medium category of 0.30<g≤0.70.


Abdurrahman, A. S. (2018). The Effect of Feedback as Soft Scaffolding on Ongoing Assessment Toward The Quantum Physics Concept Mastery of The Prospective Physics Teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia,, 7(1), 41-47.

Akhter, N. &. (2019). High School Students’ Perception of Challenges in Physics Learning and Relevance of Field Dependency. Global Social Sciences Review, 4, 336-343.

Andayani, S. (2020). Development of Learning Tools Based on Discovery Learning Models Combined with Cognitive Conflict Approaches to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Ability. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(2), 238–242.

Anisa, E., Rudibyani, R., & Emmawaty, S. (2017). Pembelajaran Discovery Learning untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar dan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 6, 283-295.

Arista, F. S. (2018). Virtual Physics Laboratory Application Based on the Android Smartphone to Improve Learning Independence and Conceptual Understanding. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 1-16.

Bello, T. O. (2018). Perceived difficult concepts in physics among senior secondary school students in Ife central local government area of Osun state. International Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education,, 3, 30-41.

Diana, N. K. (2020). Improving high school students’ physic performance usingscience process skills. Journal of Physics, 1460, 1-8.


Fahmi, S. I. (2019). Discovery Learning Method for TraininCritical Thinking Skills of Students. European Journal of Education Studies,, 6(3), 342-351.

Fatimah, N. G. (2017). Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Dengan Strategi Konflik Kognitif Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Fisika Siswa Kelas XI SMKN 1 Lingsar Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisik, 2(4), 183-190.

Festiyed, F. &. (2019). Learning model based on discovery learning equipped with interactive multimedia teaching materials assisted by games to improve critical thinking skills of high school students. Journal of Physics, 1-8.

Gunawan G, N. N. (2018). Gunawan G, Nisrina N, Suranti N M Y, EkasThe effect of virtual labs toward students' conceptual understanding of physics based on gender. Journal of Physics, 1-6.

Gunawan, G. &. (2021). The effectiveness of physics learning tools based on discovery model with cognitive conflict approach toward student’s conceptual mastery. Journal of Physics, 1747, 1-7.

Hendrik H, a. M. (2017). The Influence of Discovery Learning Model on Conceptual Understanding and Self-Efficacy of Students at Vocational High School. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 104, 1-4.

Huang, T. C. (2016). Change discovery of learning performance in dynamic. Telematics and Informatics, 33, 773-792.

Kistner, S. V. (2016). Model development in scientific discovery learning with a computer-based physics task. Computers in Human Behavior,, 59, 446-455.

Koretsky, M., Keeler, J., Ivanovitch, J., & Cao, Y. (2018). The role of pedagogical tools in active learning: a case for sense-making. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1).

Lutasari, S. &. (2019). Developing Instruments for Student Performance Assessment in Physics Practicum: A Case Study of State Senior High School of Magelang. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 6, 104- 114.

Marina Rahmayanti (2021). Application of the Discovery Learning Teaching Model in Mathematics Subjects. Community Medicine & Education Journal ,2(1),139-145.

Miatun, A. (2018). The effect of discovery learning and problem-based learning on middle school students’ self-regulated learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948, 1-7.

Nisrina, N. &. (2016). Pembelajaran kooperatif dengan media virtual untuk peningkatan penguasaan konsep fluida statis siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 2, 66-72.

Okafor, T. (2015). Difficulties Encountered by Secondary School Physics Students in Answering Mathematical Related Physics Questions. American Academic & Scholarly Research Journal., 5, 111-120.

Ponidi, P., Waziana, W., Kristina, M., & Gumanti, M. (2020). Model of Utilizing Discovery Learning to Improve Mathematical Learning Achievements. Attractive : Innovative Education Journal, 2, 41-48.

Putriani, D. &. (2018). The Effect of Discovery Learning Model Using Sunflowers in Circles on Mathematics Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 1(1), 22-25.

Radzi, N.A.M. & Sulaiman, S. (2018). Measuring students’ interest towards engineering in technical school: A case study. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(4), 231-237

Rusmana, I. M. (2014). Efektivitas Penggunaan Pendekatan SLIM-N-BIL [The Effectiveness of SLIM-N-BIL Approach]. Jurnal Formatif, 4(3), 208–218.

Sarjono, M. D. (2018). Development of Physics Lab Assessment Instrument for Senior High School Level. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 17- 28.

Shahali, E. H.M., Ismail, I. & Halim, L. (2017). STEM education in Malaysia: Policy, trajectories and initiatives. Science and Technology Trends, Policy Trajectories and Initiatives in STEM Education. Research in Science and Technological Education,122-133

Shahali E.H.M., Halim, L., Rasul, M.S., Osman, K. & Arsad N.M. (2019). Student’s interest towards STEM: A longitudinal study. Research in Science and Technological Education, 1-19.

Silaban, B. (2014). Hubungan antara penguasaan konsep fisika dan kreativitas dengan kemampuan memecahkan masalah pada materi pokok listrik statis. JURNAL PENELITIAN BIDANG PENDIDIKAN, 20(1), 65-75.

Sugiana, I. N. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Generatif Berbantuan Media Laboratorium Virtual Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Siswa pada Materi Momentum dan Impuls. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 2(2), 61-65.

Suhendi, H.Y., Ramdhani, M.A. & Irwansyah, F.S. (2018). Verification concept of assessment for physics education student learning outcome. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(321), 321- 325

Sulman, F. T. (2020). The Effect of Mathematical Connections on the Mastery of Probability Material. Edumatika. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 147–157.

Sulman, F. T. (2021). Pengaruh Media Animasi Berkarakter Islami Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pengetahuan Bumi dan Antariksa. Edumaspul. Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(1), 135–146.

Sunal, D. D. ( 2016). The 21st Century Physics Classroom: What Students, Teachers, and Classroom Observers Report. . School Science and Mathematics, 116(3), 116-126.

Suranti, N. M. (2017). Pengaruh Model Project Based Learning Berbantuan Media Virtual Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Peserta didik pada Materi Alat-alat Optik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 2(2), 73–79.

Yamashita, K. F. (2015). Practices of algorithm education based on discovery learning using a program visualization system. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 15, 1-19.

Fleckenstein, J., Leucht, M., Pant, H. A., & Köller, O. (2016). Proficient beyond borders: assessing non-native speakers in a native speakers’ framework. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 4(1).

Koretsky, M., Keeler, J., Ivanovitch, J., & Cao, Y. (2018). The role of pedagogical tools in active learning: a case for sense-making. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1).

Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement : enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. 467–481.

Zainudin, S., Halim, L. & Iksan, Z. (2015). How 60:40 policy affects the development of science curriculum in Malaysia. Educational Community and Curtural Diversity, 3, 1396-1405.

Ziad, W. K., Md Nor’Azam, M. F. A., Kaco, H., Mohd Idris, F., Zulkefly, N. R., Mohd, S. M., & Mohamad Jan, N. H. (2021). An Evaluation of Student’s Perception Towards Learning Physics at Lower Secondary School. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 11, 94-106.

Zulkifli, F., & Abidin, R. Z. (2022). A Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Essential Approach to Constructing Assessment Questions for the Probability and Statistics Course. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(3).



Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Subramaniam, G., & Sapri, R. (2022). Using Discovery Learning Strategy as A Teaching Method to Enhance Conceptual Mastery Among Polytechnic’ Engineering Science Students in Learning Linear Motion. Sosyal Bilimlerde Nicel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(2), 104–114. Geliş tarihi gönderen